Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Anticancer Res ; 42(9): 4529-4533, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2010567

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Many patients with locally advanced cancer of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction receive definitive or neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. Patient anticipation of this treatment can cause or aggravate distress and sleep disorders. This study aimed to identify the prevalence of sleep disorders and risk factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients assigned to radio-chemotherapy were retrospectively evaluated for pre-treatment sleep disorders. Investigated characteristics included age; sex; performance score; comorbidity index; previous malignancies; family history; distress score; emotional, physical or practical problems; tumor site; histology and grading; tumor stage; planned treatment; and relation to 2019 Coronavirus pandemic. RESULTS: Sleep problems were reported by 15 patients (39.5%). Significant associations were found for higher distress scores (p=0.016) and greater numbers of emotional problems (p<0.0001). A trend was observed for greater numbers of physical problems (p=0.176). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of sleep problems was high. Risk factors were found that can help identify patients requiring psychological support already prior to radio-chemotherapy.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Esophageal Neoplasms , Sleep Wake Disorders , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Combined Modality Therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Esophagectomy , Esophagogastric Junction/pathology , Humans , Neoadjuvant Therapy/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Sleep Wake Disorders/epidemiology , Sleep Wake Disorders/etiology , Sleep Wake Disorders/pathology
2.
BMJ ; 377: e068714, 2022 04 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1807349

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate sintilimab versus placebo in combination with chemotherapy (cisplatin plus paclitaxel or cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil) as first line treatment of unresectable locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. DESIGN: Multicentre, randomised, double blind, phase 3 trial. SETTING: 66 sites in China and 13 sites outside of China between 14 December 2018 and 9 April 2021. PARTICIPANTS: 659 adults (aged ≥18 years) with advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma who had not received systemic treatment. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomised 1:1 to receive sintilimab or placebo (3 mg/kg in patients weighing <60 kg or 200 mg in patients weighing ≥60 kg) in combination with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every three weeks. The trial was amended to allow investigators to choose the chemotherapy regimen: cisplatin plus paclitaxel or cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (800 mg/m2 continuous infusion on days 1-5). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall survival in all patients and in patients with combined positive scores of ≥10 for expression of programmed cell death ligand 1. RESULTS: 659 patients were randomly assigned to sintilimab (n=327) or placebo (n=332) with chemotherapy. 616 of 659 patients (93%) received sintilimab or placebo in combination with cisplatin plus paclitaxel and 43 of 659 patients (7%) received sintilimab or placebo in combination with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil. At the interim analysis, sintilimab with chemotherapy showed better overall survival compared with placebo and chemotherapy in all patients (median 16.7 v 12.5 months, hazard ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 0.78, P<0.001) and in patients with combined positive scores of ≥10 (17.2 v 13.6 months, 0.64, 0.48 to 0.85, P=0.002). Sintilimab and chemotherapy significantly improved progression free survival compared with placebo and chemotherapy in all patients (7.2 v 5.7 months, 0.56, 0.46 to 0.68, P<0.001) and in patients with combined positive scores of ≥10 (8.3 v 6.4 months, 0.58, 0.45 to 0.75, P<0.001). Adverse events related to treatment occurred in 321 of 327 patients (98%) in the sintilimab-chemotherapy group versus 326 of 332 (98%) patients in the placebo-chemotherapy group. Rates of adverse events related to treatment, grade ≥3, were 60% (196/327) and 55% (181/332) in the sintilimab-chemotherapy and placebo-chemotherapy groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with placebo, sintilimab in combination with cisplatin plus paclitaxel showed significant benefits in overall survival and progression free survival as first line treatment in patients with advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Similar benefits of sintilimab with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil seem promising. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03748134.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma , Adolescent , Adult , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Cisplatin/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/drug therapy , Fluorouracil/therapeutic use , Humans , Paclitaxel/therapeutic use
4.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg ; 28(3): 395-398, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-926047

ABSTRACT

We present here a gastrostomy procedure performed on a patient diagnosed with COVID-19 with no oral intake due to esophageal cancer in order to permit the initiation of COVID-19 treatment, and the COVID-19 protocols followed as per the pandemic guidelines. A 55-year-old female patient diagnosed recently with esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma was consulted for a surgical gastrostomy in the absence of oral intake due to complete esophageal obstruction prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The patient had a new-onset cough and elevated body temperature (38°C) on admission to our clinic, and so was tested for COVID-19, with the final diagnosis established with PCR. In order to initiate COVID-19 treatment, a surgical gastrostomy was performed under semi-emergency conditions, following COVID-19 infection prevention guidelines. COVID-19 treatment, nutrition, and supportive therapy were initiated through the gastrostomy catheter. The patient is clinically stable on day 7 of treatment. A COVID-19 patient may require emergency surgical intervention during the fight against pandemic. When a surgical procedure is performed, all guidelines defined to protect healthcare workers from COVID-19 infection should be followed.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Gastrostomy/methods , Humans , Middle Aged , Operating Rooms , Pandemics
5.
Surg Today ; 50(10): 1240-1248, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-888203

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Patients who receive trastuzumab (T-mab) plus chemotherapy for stage IV HER2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer sometimes respond remarkably well and can undergo radical surgery. However, the clinical outcomes of preoperative T-mab combined chemotherapy with radical gastrectomy remain unclear. We conducted this study to investigate the clinical outcomes of this multimodal treatment. METHODS: From among a total of 199 patients who received T-mab-based chemotherapy for stage IV HER2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer between 2011 and 2018, the subjects of this retrospective analysis were 20 patients who subsequently underwent radical gastrectomy. RESULTS: Seven patients had gastroesophageal junction cancer and 13 had gastric cancer. Eleven patients had unresectable stage IV cancer and 9 had resectable metastatic disease. Chemotherapy regimens included capecitabine, cisplatin + T-mab (11 patients), and S-1, oxaliplatin + T-mab (nine patients). The median number of chemotherapy cycles before surgery was three (range, 2-62). During preoperative chemotherapy, grade 3/4 adverse events developed in six patients. None suffered grade ≥ 3b postoperative complications. The 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 58.9% and 89.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Combined preoperative T-mab-based chemotherapy and surgery appears to be safe and effective for stage IV HER2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer, with a clinically meaningful impact on RFS and OS.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophagogastric Junction , Gastrectomy , Receptor, ErbB-2 , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Trastuzumab/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Combined Modality Therapy , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Disease-Free Survival , Esophageal Neoplasms/genetics , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Preoperative Care , Retrospective Studies , Stomach Neoplasms/genetics , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Young Adult , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
6.
J Infect Chemother ; 27(1): 99-102, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-753271

ABSTRACT

We present three patients affected by pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma, metastatic esophageal cancer and advanced non-Hodgkin lymphoma, who incurred in coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) infection during the early phase of epidemic wave in Italy. All patients presented with fever. Social contact with subject positive for COVID-19 was declared in only one of the three cases. In all cases, laboratory findings showed lymphopenia and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP). Chest x-ray and computed tomography showed bilateral ground-glass opacities, shadowing, interstitial abnormalities, and "crazy paving" pattern which evolved with superimposition of consolidations in one patient. All patients received antiviral therapy based on ritonavir and lopinavir, associated with hydroxychloroquine. Despite treatment, two patients with advanced cancers died after 39 and 17 days of hospitalization, while the patient with lung cancer was dismissed at home, in good conditions.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Lopinavir/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Ritonavir/therapeutic use , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/complications , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Disease Outbreaks , Drug Therapy, Combination , Esophageal Neoplasms/complications , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Fatal Outcome , Humans , Italy , Lung Neoplasms/complications , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/complications , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/diagnosis , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/drug therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL